COST vs MNST
By Alex · Tickerpine
Costco Wholesale Corporation vs Monster Beverage Corporation, side by side — the numbers that matter, in plain English. No “winner” hype; you decide.
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $949.58 | $45.98 |
| Market cap | $421.12B | $90.08B |
| P/E ratio | 47.4 | 42.2 |
| ROE | 29.15% | 25.70% |
| Profit margin | 3.01% | 23.08% |
| Revenue growth | 21.50% | 20.20% |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | — |
| Beta | 0.86 | 0.52 |
Green = the more favorable figure for that metric (lower P/E, higher ROE, margin, growth and yield). Not a recommendation.
COST vs MNST in plain English
- COST is the bigger company — about 4.7× the market cap of MNST.
- MNST is cheaper on earnings (P/E 42.2 vs 47.4).
- COST earns a higher return on equity (29% vs 26%).
- COST is growing revenue faster (22% vs 20%).
- COST pays a dividend (0.62%) while the other effectively doesn't.
How would $1,000 have done in each?
COST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Costco Wholesale Corporation would be worth today.
MNST return calculator
See what $1,000 in Monster Beverage Corporation would be worth today.
Figures from public market data, may be delayed. Comparison is informational only — not investment advice.